POSTER EVALUATION 2022 Reviewer Name(Required)PAMELA PASCARELLIAbstracts(Required)Select onePoster 1011Poster 1012Poster 1013Poster 1014Poster 1015Poster 1016Poster 1017Poster 1018Poster 1019Poster 1020Poster 1021Poster 1022Poster 1023Poster 1024Poster 1025Poster 1026Poster 1027Poster 1028Poster 1029Poster 1030Poster 1031Poster 1032Poster 1033Title(Required) Missing - 0 Unclear, does not connect to the purpose of work - 1 Clear but not engaging or not connecting to the purpose - 2 Clear, concise engaging and connects to the purpose of work and conference theme - 3 Background/ Significance(Required) Missing - 0 Describes the content of background, but lacks organization, specific details, or too wordy - 1 Describes the content of background, but somewhat disorganized, lacks specific information - 2 Describes the content, connects subject to background in a clear, organized, and concise manner - 3 Method/Content discussion(Required) Method/Content is incomplete, missed or poorly discussed - 0 Method/Content is not clear. Major content is addressed but not well supported - 1 Method/Content of the writing is clear. Major content is addressed clearly and somewhat supported- 2 Method/Content is complete and clear. All major content is stated clearly and is well supported. Content relevant to conference theme - 3 Outcomes/implication (Contribution to nursing)(Required) Missing - 1 Unclear and lacks detail of contribution to the discipline - 1 Attempts to connect the content to discipline, but unclear - 2 Clearly states how the content advances knowledge and why it is important. - 3 Length of the abstract(Required) Abstract is not the appropriate length: less than 100 or more than 300 - 1 Abstract is at the appropriate length: Max 300 words - 3 Professional writing(Required) Contain more than 5 grammatical errors, typos, inappropriate verb tense, fail to define more than 3 acronyms at first use - 0 Contain more than 3 grammatical errors, typos but does not impede understanding and fail to define less than 2 acronyms at first use - 1 Contain less than 3 grammatical errors or typos; mixed verb tense, defines all acronyms at first use - 2 Written appropriately for the profession; defines all acronyms at first use; appropriate verb tense - 3 Reference (APA format)(Required) Missing or less than 2 references, irrelevant, too basic and not in correct order - 0 Has 3 or more references, not relevant to the topic, and references not in the correct order - 1 Good use of relevant references, not cited properly in the text. All references are in the correct order - 2 Used clear relevant references, skillfully cited in the text. All references are in the correct order - 3 NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.